can you post any pictures of both your cats?
I posted these somewhere some time ago (maybe back on Formspring?) but it's been a while. Misty and Buster, respectively:
Ask @batman9502
Previous
Ya know with Raiden having his pain inhibitors off I kind of suspect him to say "hurt me more" for whatever reason. Is it there really some kind of relation between pain and pleasure? I simply find it odd.
Someone asked something similar a while back, but I think it has less to do with pleasure from pain and more to do with being able to truly experience all aspects of a battle to the death. If you can't feel pain from it, it becomes a lot easier to grow detached from the whole thing. He wants to feel everything, good and bad, and fully revel in the "thrill of battle" so to speak.
Awesome! I love Mountain Dew!
Yeah, it's not bad.
Related users
I know you drink milk, but do you drink soda at all? Some people like it, some people are like "No, get it away from me!", and some people are like, "Eh, I'll have water, thanks"
Sure. I'll drink Mountain Dew, Dr. Pepper, Coke, or Pepsi.
did you know that if you take the first letter of all the worlds besides the final one in Kirby's Return to Dreamland, it will spell out the word crowned. Pointimg out to the final boss
The french names of the levels spell parfait.
Do you have/had any pets?
Two cats at my parents house, none at the apartment.
What is your primary source of news?
I mostly just browse the news on Google.
Do you like Metallica or Guns n' Roses? If not what is you favorite Rock n' Roll band? A random question is have you played through mgs 2 and 4 and why I ask is because Raiden or Jack is in both of them. Loved the ending of mgs 4 and the fight with vamp in mgs 4 as well. Do you like them? Thanks bye
Yes pretty much across the board.
Do you believe that zodiac signs hold some truth? What sign are you?
No.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6yx0EsP4fg this is the scene i was talking about. see if it brings memorys back
I remember the basics but not really any specific moments that stand out.
if you can remember anything is star ocean till the end of time, what was your favorite part, or the part thats stood out. mine was on elicoor during the war when fayt realises the vendeeni are after him, and he goes all crazy in a cinimatic.
Don't remember many specifics, it's been a lot of years.
what is your favorite final fantasy game. would you ever lp it (or any final fantasy game), ever seen the movies(s), which one, and lastly, have you realised how big cloud's buster sword really is? should anyone be able to single handly carry that monster?
IX, probably not, Spirits Within (don't remember it at all so don't ask if I liked it), yes, dunno.
would the leghth of star ocean 3 contribute to the judgment of not doing it (though, i dont think it can get any worst that soa) , or are there other factors.
Even if its length was the same as Skies of Arcadia (which it's most likely longer) it doesn't hold the same amount of interest for me as SoA does. Arcadia I didn't mind doing 29 hours of because I love that game, it's one of my favorites. Star Ocean is alright, and with an alright game that long it'd quickly become drudging more than anything.
Do you consider yourself 'funny'?
If I'm comfortable and with people I know I can usually make people laugh. Probably not so good with someone I've just met as I don't really know what type of humor is up their alley. Unfortunately I'm not just naturally charismatic, but with friends we're all laughing with each other most of the time so that's good enough for me.
Did you ever have a NES or SNES when you were a kid and if you did did you have the original the legend of zelda? One more question. Did you have an artari? If you did, did you have mario bros on it? See ya. Have a good day
I had both the NES and SNES. Super Mario Bros. was the first game I ever remember playing. Never owned the original Zelda though. Didn't have an Atari.
Saw your answer on my question on ps4 or xbox one and again completely agree. I bought an Xbox 360 a week ago with minecraft and batman arkham city (which I have on the ps3) just to try it and for the ports. The graphics card is bad and a bit laggy on batman ac. Love the controller but ps4 1 is bett
I dunno. I just go with the same thing I always have.
Liked by:
Cooper Peterson
3 questions. how many more parts to be expected of the main story, how long are the 2 dlc's, and how can you get your seperate youtube videos and put them together if they arent on your computer. (recorded and uploaded from phone). or at least how to save them onto your computer for movie maker
One update, three videos (counting the codecs). An hour to an hour and a half each, each one will be its own update. You can download MP4's of your videos from the video manager, Movie Maker should have some kind of save as AVI menu option.
ever played dark souls
No.
is the metal gear rising main story almost over.
Yes.
I saw in an earlier question that you prefer cliffs of Dover (which is one of my favorite rock n roll songs of all time) over through the fire and flames. Totally agree! But what difficulty did you play these songs on? I'm best at hard on gh3. Also which do you prefer ps4 or xbox one? Ps4 is for me.
By the time GH3 came out, I never touched anything below Expert. Never owned a single Xbox console and have owned every Playstation console since the PS1 (minus handhelds) so even before any news I pretty much knew which way I'd end up going.
Do/did you ever play any fighting games at all? I know you were into SSB back in the day, but anything else? I know me and my buds played Street Fighter once in a while back in the day.
I've never really been into any of them seriously. I've played basically all the franchises: Smash, Street Fighter, Mortal Kombat, Tekken, some Killer Instinct... they've all really just been stuff to do with friends though.
Do you beileve in darwins theory of evolution? What might contradict your opinion. And random question, is the rest of your family nonreligious, or just you
It's not a matter of "believing" in it. There is a scientific consensus among biologists that descent with modification is one of the most well-established scientific facts. It's up there with things like the theory of gravity, the theory of relativity, germ theory, atomic theory, etc. Like any scientific theory its falsifiability isn't hard to demonstrate, any data that contradicts the predictions it makes would do the trick. The most common example is if we found a rabbit fossil from the Precambrian era this would force us to dramatically alter our view of evolution. Any evidence that shows genetic mutations can't be inherited, or that different forms of life appeared spontaneously, or that the fossil record showed no changes over time, would cast major doubt over it. There are testable hypotheses all over the place that could potentially alter our understanding of evolutionary theory (as they have multiple times since Darwin initially proposed natural selection) or dissuade its acceptance altogether. I go where the data leads, any discoveries like that would force me to reevaluate my opinion as well.
I'm the only nonreligious one in my family, but it's worth noting that acceptance of evolution doesn't necessarily imply non-religiosity. There are plenty of people who believe in things like theistic evolution for example, and claim that evolution exists but was set into motion by God.
I'm the only nonreligious one in my family, but it's worth noting that acceptance of evolution doesn't necessarily imply non-religiosity. There are plenty of people who believe in things like theistic evolution for example, and claim that evolution exists but was set into motion by God.
Liked by:
Cooper Peterson
Lanky Orangutan
Brandon Lum
What's a good question to ask you?
Something not as lazy as this question.
What would be your guess of the positives and negatives of stronger gravity on the human body? I think it would take a while for the body to readjust to the gravity and that the internal organs would be worn out faster.
I'm going to expand this a bit and just discuss the overall effects of increased gravity, as it's all important for human survival and more fun to think about than limiting it to the body. Keep in mind I'm not a physicist by any stretch, this is all just based on my understanding.
My guess is it would be mostly negative for us I'm afraid. You can nip this in the bud by saying the only way Earth's gravity could realistically increase is for it to gain a lot of mass. Basically this means something really big colliding with us. A collision with something this massive would likely mean the extinction of most life on the planet. Probably all except sea life living in the deep ocean near geothermal vents providing the planet is still mostly intact physically. Certainly us.
If we're to assume the laws of physics just magically changed and we suddenly gained a stronger gravitational force (or suddenly gained more mass), it would take a while for everything, not just us, to adapt. A big danger in this scenario comes from the orbit of the moon. With a stronger gravitational force, we'd likely be substantially messing with the moon's orbit around us. The most catastrophic thing would be a collision, otherwise some funky and dangerous things would be happening with the tides for those living near the current coasts. The day would also be very slightly lengthened.
Any people with heart conditions would probably not survive, as the heart must work harder to circulate blood throughout the body. Those who did would eventually develop stronger muscles and bones to support the increased weight. We would probably become shorter over time to lessen the workload of our internal organs. Many plants wouldn't be able to survive either, collapsing under their increased weight. Flights would be temporarily put on hold as we figure out how to generate more lift to overcome the increased weight, namely more powerful engines. Car suspensions would be forced to support more weight (we'd see a lot more unintentional low-riders) . Major cities would have problems as many tall buildings collapse.
That's not even counting potential changes to the atmosphere and the environment. Long story short life has evolved to thrive on this planet under these conditions. Suddenly throwing all these systems out of equilibrium would make for a very rough time, nearly universally negative. Eventually life would adapt barring a catastrophic event, but I wouldn't call this a plus, more like breaking even.
Good question. Thanks.
My guess is it would be mostly negative for us I'm afraid. You can nip this in the bud by saying the only way Earth's gravity could realistically increase is for it to gain a lot of mass. Basically this means something really big colliding with us. A collision with something this massive would likely mean the extinction of most life on the planet. Probably all except sea life living in the deep ocean near geothermal vents providing the planet is still mostly intact physically. Certainly us.
If we're to assume the laws of physics just magically changed and we suddenly gained a stronger gravitational force (or suddenly gained more mass), it would take a while for everything, not just us, to adapt. A big danger in this scenario comes from the orbit of the moon. With a stronger gravitational force, we'd likely be substantially messing with the moon's orbit around us. The most catastrophic thing would be a collision, otherwise some funky and dangerous things would be happening with the tides for those living near the current coasts. The day would also be very slightly lengthened.
Any people with heart conditions would probably not survive, as the heart must work harder to circulate blood throughout the body. Those who did would eventually develop stronger muscles and bones to support the increased weight. We would probably become shorter over time to lessen the workload of our internal organs. Many plants wouldn't be able to survive either, collapsing under their increased weight. Flights would be temporarily put on hold as we figure out how to generate more lift to overcome the increased weight, namely more powerful engines. Car suspensions would be forced to support more weight (we'd see a lot more unintentional low-riders) . Major cities would have problems as many tall buildings collapse.
That's not even counting potential changes to the atmosphere and the environment. Long story short life has evolved to thrive on this planet under these conditions. Suddenly throwing all these systems out of equilibrium would make for a very rough time, nearly universally negative. Eventually life would adapt barring a catastrophic event, but I wouldn't call this a plus, more like breaking even.
Good question. Thanks.
Liked by:
Brandon Lum
Will you ever do a Batman: Arkham City walkthrough and when it comes out (Batman: Arkham Origins) wil you buy it?
http://ask.fm/batman9502/answer/27324381782
Re: Origins, I'll probably get it at some point.
Re: Origins, I'll probably get it at some point.
Liked by:
Cooper Peterson
Next
