@MajedJarrar

Majed Jarrar

Ask @MajedJarrar

Sort by:

LatestTop

Previous

دعوه بالله عليكم عندي امتحان ومرعوبه 😞

ربي يجعل همك الآخرة ولا ترعبك حاجة غير مخافة فوات رضاه.
كل ما دون ذلك = هيّن.
أو كما يقول المصريون: في البزرميط.

السلام عليكم ما راي حضرتك في من تسافر وحدها للدراسة؟ اريد التقدم لفتاة احسبها على خلق حسن ودين لكن هي تريد ان تدرس في منتريال واهلها في اوتاوا. رأيكم مهم لي. جزاكم الله عنا كل خير 😊

الأمر يحتاج إحاطة بحالها وحال أسرتها. لو غالب خبرها مقبول تزوجها واحملها الى مونتريال 😘

People you may like

StephenInd’s Profile Photo Stephen Ind
also likes
marwamahmoud5’s Profile Photo مروةة
also likes
reereelouise’s Profile Photo Ree
also likes
psalmist6156588’s Profile Photo Sky
also likes
ArianaIsBack’s Profile Photo Ari ^-^
also likes
RahmaChips’s Profile Photo ama
also likes
Want to make more friends? Try this: Tell us what you like and find people with the same interests. Try this:
+ add more interests + add your interests

As salam alkyum. What is the proof that blood is najas as you said? Any hadith that states it jazakallahu khayran.

Blood is Najis (spiritually filthy) according to the unanimous decision of the ummah. I don't know what those contemporary salafis were thinking when they - for the first time in fourteen century - decided to come up with this claim that the companions, and the tabi'een and their tabi'een, and the four imams, and the whole ummah, were all mistaken and issued a baseless ruling without a daleel.
If someone said but Abu Hanifa said this, they interrupt and say akhi, we only follow the daleel. If someone said: what's the daleel that x contemporary Salafi has on this matter they say, I don't know but he must know one he wouldn't speak without knowledge. Do you see the double standards?
The consensus IS the daleel.
Imam Ahmed was asked: "Are blood and puss are equal to you?"
He said: "As for blood, no one differed that it's Najis. As for puss, some have argued about it."
Imam Annawawi says: "As for blood, it is Najis by the consensus of the Muslims. No one has challenged that except some philosophers who claimed that blood is clean."
The consensus was reported by Imam Ahmed and Annawawi, as well as Ibn Hajar, Ibn Rushd, Ibn Hazm, Ibn Abdulbarr and AlQurtubi.
So when we say: those contemporary Salafis are clueless about Fiqh. It's not because we are jealous or have beef with them because of a few opinions in Fiqh. No, these are a tip of an iceberg. It's because their approach to Fiqh disregards the cumulative work of thousands of scholars of the ummah, under the claim of following the Qur'an and Sunnah. Not only it is chaotic and almost as anarchist as that of the philosophers and khawarij, It also has a hidden implication that the salaf were making up opinions without a daleel, which is a major sin!
If you claim that one of their contemporaries has no daleel, they'll fight you like you're the enemy of Islam.
Then they wonder why people accuse them of blind following of contemporary scholars.
The Almighty is the sufficient one to turn to for complaint and seeking aid.

View more

Assalamu'alaykum Ustadh.. Just wanted to ask you about this claim of Ibn masood's script of Quran having slight variation.. If that's true what was the reason for that? JazakAllahu khayran

The Qur'an was revealed verbally not in writing, and has been preserved verbally until today. There are things in the verbal chain of transmission of Qur'an are never written until today, and you can only learn them if you memorise with a scholar who has a connected chain to the prophet.
See number six for more:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10154354539328737&id=508038736
The entire Qur'an was written during the time of the prophet. The prophet had fifty scribes writing every verse as it was revealed, on pieces of skin etc. But keep in mind that thousands had memorised it in parallel.
In the time of Abu Bakr, the entire Qur'an was compiled into one book - from thereon called the Mus-haf. It was written according to Zaid bin Thabit, the main scribe of the prophet.
In the time of Uthman, the unification of the script was brought up. There were no dictation rules of Arabic yet, and each one of the fifty scribes may have written the sounds differently. For example the phrase: wa laata heena manaas, some companions wrote it as wala taheena manaas. The result of thorough discussion among all the companions in the time of Uthman on every sound and letter, was the Mus-haf of Uthman, Which took in consideration all input from the scribes and checked it against the agreed memorising of all the companions. The methodology that Uthman put was: if everyone agrees with Zaid, write it as Zaid did (in the Mus-haf of Abu Bakr), if there was disagreement, write it according to what the Qurashiyyeen (e.g. Abdullah b Zubair, Saeed b As, Abdurrahman b AlHaarith).
So they differed in one word: attaboot should it be written التابوت or التابوة, both pronounced the same. Zaid said with ة the rest agreed it should be ت so they wrote it as ت. And so on.
There was no disagreement which one was right or wrong, because again, there were no Arabic dictation rules yet. They were in fact canonizing them.

View more

Liked by: Kamrul Hasan

I'm a teacher in public school we have a group for all teachers and we visit each others once a month,I'm hijaby and they respect my religion&believes,this year we have a new lesbian teacher:( is it islamicaly ok for me to accept her visit to my house or go out for food if she is with the group ?

No doubt that homosexuality is a grave sin, even worse than someone having an affair with the neighbor's spouse.
However, homosexuality isn't worse than polytheism. It's established that Jews and Christians offer the centuries have change their originally-monotheistic religions to polytheism. Christians associate a son to God and Jews ascribe worse things to Him. That doesn't mean you can't have a professional respectful relationship with them. And perhaps your good manners and faith and upholding your religion firmly may pull them towards monotheism.
So no problem professionally, and try to keep a good circle of righteous friends to recharge and to prevent your heart from getting used to seeing sin.

As salam alkyum. Should i learn from shaykh rabee al-madkhali. Is he someone that I can learn from forr hadith fiqh and so on? Or should I look for someone else.

No doubt he has some good things.
But I've studied under several students of Sheikh alalbani, and mixing with students of rabee - personal students - was always, always, toxic. As to his online fans, and websites that promote him, run away from them.
Liked by: Bahy Emam

As salaam alaikum. Is blood najas is the hanbali matdhab. If one bleeds or has blood on their clothes human blood is it najas they have to clean it off before praying. Such as your own blood or blood of someone else aside from menstrstion blood

Blood is najas, without doubt.
Little amounts of blood or puss are forgiven. "Little" is relative up to what each person can handle or consider gross.

As salam alkyum. Why do people say people of hadith have little fiqh? Is it because they only learned dhadith and that is not their field.

It's not people who say it, the quote belongs to Imam Ahmed, the most knowledgable scholar of Hadeeth of all time. So much so that it was said that a Hadeeth that Ahmed did not know, was not a Hadeeth.
He is also one of the greatest scholars of Fiqh of all time.
It is because it's luring to its people, they think they understand Islam because they memorised some Hadeeth.

Assalamu alaykum shaykh. Should one follow Sh. Al Albani rh in fiqh and his rulings? I say this because a lot of brothers force his opinion on me even if I say I tell them I follow the opinion of my madhab

Those who follow him because they assume high of him, fall into blind following, which they prohibit harshly themselves. They claim they follow the daleel, but in most times they only follow what Sheikh alalbny told them is the daleel and how to understand it. If you give them an authentic Hadeeth that contradicts Sheikh alalbani's opinion they'll hesitate to follow and say: Sheikh alalbani can't have missed this. We can't assume bad of scholars.
Yet, they assume the worst in the salaf, and blatantly say Abu Hanifa was wrong, and Ahmed didn't know that Hadeeth was weak.
I do not know the ruling towards these people but I ask Allah to guide them to the sunnah and follow the footsteps of the salaf of the ummah.
As to you, if they think it's safe to follow a knowledgable scholar like alalbani, then it surely is safer and better and greater to follow a mathhab, where thousands of scholars worked together over centuries to give rulings to the best of their ability.
If you wanted to follow one role model in Fiqh, then follow an Imam of the salaf like Malik or Ashafi'i.

View more

Liked by: Bahy Emam

Salaam-Alaikum. Earlier you stated "The most heinous of sins are those that do not have an expiation." Can you please list some (or all) of these sins as a reminder for us all. Jazakallah Khair

Of the tongue: Backstabbing, lying, deceiving, cheating, stirring up enmity,
Of the limbs: missing prayers (according to the opinion that says you don't make them up), drugs, homosexual acts (according to the opinion that they don't get punished equal to adultery), committing suicide,
Of the heart: arrogance, greed, skepticism about God's commands, mockery or hatred towards the religion or righteous people, etc.
May the Almighty protect and accept our repentance.

http://ask.fm/MajedJarrar/answers/139957258562 I fear if I do this he may be uninterested and I may end up heartbroken. If I chose not to do anything about it, I will also be heartbroken without him. It's like there is no way out.

Yes indeed there is. God says: whosoever yattaqi [be pious to, be conscious of, avoids the anger of] God, He will make a way out for them" [65:3]
So if you abstain from a relationship that could anger your Lord, rest assured that He will grant you a way out. The prophet said: "whosoever avoids something for the sake of God, God will grant them something better."
There's nothing better than a forbidden relationship than a blessed one.
The prophet said: "I have not seen a path for the couple in love better than marriage."
So have patience, and trust in what the Almighty has decreed for you, and let that man know that the blessed provision of God can only be attained through His obedience.

I reverted and got tattoos before islam. Later I will work to remove them but when looking for a spouse when should I tell him I have tattoos?

You don't need to worry about removing tattoos for now, but more importantly, if your future husband can't be forgiving about past tattoos then don't consider him for marriage, because he'll be less tolerant about everything else.

As salaam alaikum. Based on the chest in the hands which salafi scholars hold the navel opinion u stated Jazakallahu khayran

The Salafi scholar Annawawi, and the salafi scholar Ibn Rajab, and the Salafi scholar Abu Hanifa, and the Salafi scholar Ashafi'i, and the Salafi scholar Ahmed, and the salafi scholar Wakee', and the Salafi scholar Ibrahim Annakh'ee, and the Salafi scholar Rabee'a, and the Salafi scholar Wael ibn Hijr and the Salafi scholar Ali bin Abi Talib.

BarakAllahu fikum Shaykh, and just to confirm, if a person does intend it in his heart, and breaks it, he has to give the expiration? Or is that only if he speaks it loudly. Jzk. May Allah continue to make you a source of benefit to others.

No.
Be aware, that anything that has an expiation is easy. The most heinous of sins are those that do not have an expiation.

If i am applying for an Islamic studies online course but the minimum age is 16, but right now I am only 15 and I'll reach 16 this year. If I applied will this be considered as a lie?

Apply and tell them you're 15. Send a parental consent with your request.

http://www.scholarofthehouse.org/drabelfafaon.html. What would you reply to a girl in ur halalah if she sent u this post ? Do u know the writer? Please let me know what is the best way to talk to the girls next time I c them , it is very important, Jazak allah khairan

If she attends my halaqa, or has studied seera, she'll know when Hijab was revealed, and that this man is a liar.

SubhannAllah. I thought vows don't count unless spoken. al-Insaaf (11/118): A vow does not count unless it is spoken. If he intends it without speaking, then it is not counted as a vow, and there is no dispute on this point. I thought that this may refer to it... https://islamqa.info/en/87767

They do not count from the perspective : if you break it, a Muslim judge can't order you to expiate, because you didn't utter the oath. That's what you'll find in the books of Fiqh.
However, if you determined an oath in your heart, then God has heard it, and you must fulfill your covenants with the Almighty without doubt. God said: "and fulfill my covenant, so I fulfill yours" and "Fulfill your covenant with God if you establish one, and do not break oaths after asserting them if you want God the guarantor over you." [16:91] This is not a matter of rulings, but rather about heart purification, and you'll find it in the books of Tazkiyah.

When a person makes an oath, they must say swear by Allah or His attributes out loud right? Also if someone says "wallahi" but does not hear themselves, does that count as an oath?

For a person to believe you, and for the angels to write it down, and for God to hold you accountable for it, it must be audible, a whisper is the minimum audible sound.
For God to hear you, such as if you want to make an oath to obey Him, you just need to think about it. Not even angels will hear that. Oaths to obey God are discouraged in Islam, He does not need your oath. However any oath must be fulfilled, it is a serious obligation.

Is falling in love gunnah? I Mean you just see someone and can't stop thinking about em . No matter how hard you try. You can't control your heart. Can we ?

I don't know what you meant by gunnah.
There's nothing wrong about falling in love, one can't be held accountable for something that cannot be controlled.
However, you are held account for every action that comes out of you. Love is not an excuse to fall in sin, or disobey God and His messenger.

As salam alkyum. In the prophets prayer book described shaykh Albani says that the hands go on the chest? What Is your view on this take.

A bid'a, no one in the scholars of Islam understood it that way he did. Sadr in Arabic starts from the neck bone to the navel, it is not the chest that's above the diaphragm, as medically speaking. All scholars understood the hadeeth as putting the hands on the navel, or slightly below it or slightly above it. But the sheikh only read the hadeeths, and derived his understanding from the words, not from the understanding of the salaf. That's why we say it's dangerous to learn from books only without a teacher. How many hadeeths that are authentic but are unanimously discarded by practice of the salaf, and how many hadeeths are weak but the action is reported in agreement of three majority of the companions?
Sheikh alalbani rahimahullah himself emphasised the importance of following the understanding of salaf, not imitating men blindly. So when the Sheikh falls in a simple forgiven mistake like that, a good student who understands the sheikh's holistic message, will excuse the Sheikh, and follow the salaf. A blind follower will defend the sheikh's mistakes and find excuses for them.
So, Alhamdolillah for these small mistakes of our scholars; for they showed us who are true followers of the salaf and those who are the blind followers of contemporary scholars.

View more

http://ask.fm/MajedJarrar/answers/139115064898 مقلتليش,زي مين؟

كثير جدا، كل واحد عنده من يحرك مشاعره بحسب نوع ذنوبه وحاله ومستواه في القران، لكن مما يمر بذهني الان من المشاهير الشيخ ابراهيم السكران، والشيخ عمرو الشرقاوي، والشيخ وجدان العلي، والشيخ خالد الجبير، والشيخ خالد ابو شادي، والشيخ محمد راتب النابلسي، والشيخ نبيل العوضي، والشيخ مشاري العرادة، والشيخ محمد العريفي. ونعمان علي خان - على فضله ووزنه - في مستوى تلامذة هؤلاء، بل أعرف حقا من تلامذتهم من يتفوق عليه في العلم.
Liked by: حسن جعران

Next

Language: English