@HollywoodDaddy

Hollywood Daddy

Ask @HollywoodDaddy

Sort by:

LatestTop

Previous

Just perused your blog (twitter) and I take it back, you come off like a smug retard eesh

I don't use twitter.
Also, who said I wasn't a smug retard or there was anything wrong with being one.
Enjoy your 'blech' (lol).

People keep linking your ask.fm. You write some good stuff but as I read more I got a "blech" vibe. Everything is terrible and you're gonna eat some worms. Remember I like you, it's just the vibe was kinda weird. I dunno. I don't know you. Big blessings or whatever people say

Wasn't aware anyone was linking my ask.fm. Don't think it matters.
The idea that you think my 'vibe' is for your benefit only confirms the disdain I have for most people (like you).
Your passive-aggressive blessings aren't needed, save them for the next time you see mom.
Like, I know this is difficult (for you) to understand, but, some human beings don't value their popularity. They actually give a shit about other stuff, like, sunsets and blow jobs.

Do you consider yourself a recluse?

Kind of.
I greatly enjoy voyeurism and have to be around people to engage in the activity. I consider it being alone, though, and quietly not interacting with anyone. And I don't mean, like, 'peeping tom' creeper voyeurism.
Aspect of my personality where it's exhausting to interact in group settings. I become very sick or aggressive if I do. It's not fun for me or anyone else.
It took a while to identify, but now refuse to be in those situations, unless it's a 'special' occasion.
Consider myself a loquacious loner. Like, if I feel comfortable around a person, then I'll converse at length. Also, engage in a lot of communication on the internet because I view it as talking with myself.
When I commuted for 6hrs a day, would have in depth conversations inside my mind with someone about a subject that was broached in a prior interaction. Almost never followed up with the actual conversation though. It was more an exercise in understanding all aspects of a topic, from my perspective and theirs.
Mostly okay with a diet of internal dialogue, but, sometimes, I feel lonesome or anxious and desire the company of other human beings. Typically, go for long walks without a goal destination while thinking/watching until I'm okay being a recluse again. Or, if i'm lucky, will discover somebody interesting to engage, like a homeless person, drug addict, teenager, hooker or day laborer. They almost always initiate the conversation though.
I actually like one-on-one interaction, in real life or the internet. It rarely happens. Feel like i'm annoying a person for initiating dialogue and consequently almost never do.
Another aspect of my personality is gaining satisfaction by absorbing new facts/ideas/experiences. Which means if someone does talk to me and I view them as 'interesting', then I inundate them with questions.
Which some people find overwhelming.
So, yes/no to being a recluse.

View more

Related users

Death on Credit is another Celine worth reading, the one about his childhood. I got a biog of him and his life makes pussies of most of us. Thing is he only wrote about his life. But he added delirium/hallucination. Journey is one of those books that makes life worth living. It gives me strength.

I'll have to peep that shit. Thanks for the knowledge.

"pervy and deviant" haha - kaddish is good i think. it's similar to one of my faves - Louis F Celine. Have you read him? Or if not, have you read much hemingway? i find his prose is giving me a lot of pleasure lately. I used to read him. Then I didn't for years. Now I do again.

Yeah, I read 'journey' a while ago. I liked it. Dude is so angry it speaks to my heart. His other stuff I haven't touched. I picked up one book, I forget which, and read a couple pages and it didn't seem to have the same magic. Maybe I'm being too judgmental though.
Papa H is the bitch's bastard. His short stories are better than most anything.

What do you think of Allen Ginsberg?

Thought 'howl' was pretty awesome and beautiful. The rest of his stuff i've read has been all zzz's.
Think he was the type of homosexual man to wear shit-stained underoos over his face. Dude seemed pervy and deviant.

have you seen the film "Funny Games"? if so, how'd you feel about it?

I've only seen the original. i liked it.
I don't usually enjoy films in that vein. The, like, experimental or academic or preachy type. Usually, the story is shit and I don't feel invested in anything I'm witnessing.
But the story in 'funny games' was intriguing. I felt very invested in the characters. Which was haneke's design.
It gave me a slightly different perspective film hadn't previously given, or, at least, it brought something I tacitly understood to the surface. But, most importantly, it made me 'feel.'
Kenny B. turned me on to haneke a while back. I'm glad he did. 'The Piano Teacher' devastated me. I love when a movie does that. It's such a rare quality.

Everything here is the best thing ever. Its how I found htmlgiant. And I come from Florida. Tampa. Why do people run from where they come from

How was the book?
Think people 'run' because they believe 'environment' is the sole cause of life problems. What they don't understand is that circumstance is only part of the equation. It's a lot easier to change external factors than internalizations.
But, eventually, everybody realizes the voice in their head is the culprit. Some choose to acknowledge it, most others ignore/self-medicate/distract.

you wanna suck sam pink's pink pussy and you know it you old howling hollywood doggy. pink's pink pussy you wanna you wet dog dough.

Seems like you're the one having sexual ideations about sam and me. Like, this 'question' seems to have the energy of a guy who's swallowed a couple 'skinny pirates' and can't hold back his homoerotic thoughts.
I mean, if anything, i'd be nailing a girl from behind while sam shoves his dick down her throat, and, at some point, in the heat of battle, our dicks would touch, probably inside her mouth. And i feel completely okay if that happens.
Another man's dick isn't scary or threatening or fetishized to me. It's just skin, baby.
Ya better get one more SP in before last call.
Until next time, sweetums.

"Since the mid-nineties." shit, i started watching around the same time. my folks had satellite and i remember watching the early Extreme Fighting and Reality Fighting and seeing Renzo's upkick finish of Oleg - heartstopping. those were the days.

Yeah, I definitely miss the style vs style days. It was like bloodsport but better. Think mma is awesome right now though and it's going to be getting better for years to come.
The women are so hungry and tenacious now. If you haven't watched any of the old invicta cards, I recommend them.
Oleg is a beast but Renzo is supernatural.

"Making a passive-aggressive remark in response was pure whine.." grateful that you pointed that out. trying to root it out of my life. peace.

Hell yeah, see you at the finish line.

Why didn't you answer my "shut up nigger" question? That shows to me that you're weak.

Because i've already stated several times i'm not going to entertain frivolous bullshit. Calling me a name means nothing, there's no response needed. Like, as already stated before--try paying attention--if you're gonna waste my time with insults at least offer something captivating.
This, however, is an actual question, so, you get a response.
Unconcerned how you perceive me. That joy belongs to you, not me. Seems pathetic you're asking this a couple days after the original 'question' though.
With hearts and bows,
Hollywood 'NIGGER' Daddy.

Ever checked out any of Dan Fante's books?

Yeah, he's a decent writer. Not on his dad's level (who is???) but still good.
I met him when he read with Tony O'Neill a few years back. I really liked him. He had a very earnest energy.
We talked about being a victim to time and how los angeles hasn't been appreciative to his father.

here's one i been meaning to ask: What is the Daddy take on Andrea Coates? Have you ever met her?

No, I haven't. Don't put myself in many situations to interact with writer people. I thoroughly despise group settings and the only time people want to hang out now is in those environments. If I had the opportunity to interact with her face-to-face, I wouldn't be against it. I mean, i'm not against interacting with any person individually. Well, except my ex-wife. Maybe my mom (depending on her mood).
I've never paid that much attention to her. Gandered at her blog once after she harassed blake butler on facebook (which I thought was hilarious). My cursory assessment is that she possesses a high intelligence. Don't know if I believe her 'feminism' jive. At least, not completely. She likes to focus attention back to herself.
Someone said she posted nudes online. Which i'm not against. Don't know the context of it though.
Think most canadian women have a unique quality of their comeliness. It's difficult to describe but I can immediately tell a girl is from up north after setting eyes on her form.
What I find interesting about Andrea Coates is that she's the first canadian I've ever encountered with an aggressive/hostile energy. Not trying to be mean or rude, but, my observation of canadians is they're subdued, like, some seem to be in a haze and others are dopey. Even canadian mma fighters lack visible aggression.
Andrea isn't like that. She has some definite 'who is you' pumping out of her vulva.
I always appreciate that quality in people.
My boy, kyle eldridge, informed me a while back that andrea squirted out a baby. Otherwise, I don't know much else about her or what she's up to.

View more

Liked by: Juliet Escoria

"but once something is learned it can't be unlearned" HD wrote previously: "Think you need to unlearn not speaking how you feel. Dig it?"

Damn, were you actually paying attention??? Or are you just looking to fuck.
A trait of my personality is to make generalizations. According to some psychology test, I'm very adept at 'seeing the big picture', but have a difficult time focusing on details. It's not that I can't, I just don't find micromanaging very interesting. This is one of those cases.
To clarify, 'something learned can't be *completely* unlearned.' Like, there will always be a residue left behind, doesn't mean 'unlearning' is a waste of time or without merit. At at it's base value, the struggle to overcome something oppressive is what's important, the possible resulting triumph is whip cream on the perky nipple cake.
But, in regards to religion, only an intensely powerful mind could be born into that mire of psychological imprisonment and become unfettered. Don't think most people have it in them. So, what I said, as a generalization, holds true.
Recommend anyone/everyone to call me out on inconsistencies or contradictions. It helps me stay grounded.
Thanks.

View more

the amount of people who begin their twitter profile with the word "writer" is a laugh.

Twitter itself is a chuckle.

Next

Language: English